Spin the Wheel

AI Agent Protocol Standards

The Linux Foundation's Agentic AI Foundation (AAIF) is establishing critical standards for AI agent interoperability, with three foundational contributions that define how agents communicate, operate, and behave. These protocols—MCP, Goose, and AGENTS.md—represent different layers of the agent ecosystem, from low-level communication to high-level behavioral policies. Understanding these standards is essential for developers building AI agents and for organizations evaluating agent platforms. MCP (Model-Connect Protocol) from Anthropic provides the communication layer. This lightweight, JSON-based protocol defines how AI models connect to external tools and data sources. It supports authentication, rate-limiting, and tool-specific schemas, enabling secure and standardized interactions between models and external systems. MCP is designed to be simple yet flexible, allowing developers to integrate diverse tools without writing custom adapters for each provider. The protocol's message format handles request/response exchanges efficiently, supporting both synchronous and asynchronous operations. This flexibility is important because different tools have different latency characteristics—some respond immediately while others require longer processing times. MCP's design allows agents to work with both types seamlessly, improving the overall user experience. Goose from Block (Square/Cash App) provides the framework layer. This full-stack agent framework offers a declarative configuration API that simplifies agent development. Instead of writing complex code to orchestrate agent behavior, developers can declare what they want the agent to do, and Goose handles the execution details. This abstraction reduces development time and makes agents more maintainable. The plug-in architecture allows developers to extend Goose with custom actions tailored to specific use cases. This is valuable because different applications have different requirements—a customer service agent needs different capabilities than a code generation agent. The plug-in system enables specialization while maintaining a common foundation. Goose's runtime handles concurrency, retries, and audit logging automatically. This is crucial for production deployments where agents must handle multiple requests simultaneously, recover from failures gracefully, and maintain audit trails for compliance. By handling these concerns in the framework, Goose allows developers to focus on business logic rather than infrastructure. AGENTS.md from OpenAI provides the policy layer. This specification defines metadata fields and schemas for declaring how agents should behave within codebases. It's essentially a "README for robot behavior," enabling repositories to specify agent capabilities, allowed domains, and behavioral constraints. This standardization makes it easier to understand what an agent can do and how it should be used. The policy schema allows for fine-grained control over agent behavior. Developers can specify which APIs an agent can call, which data sources it can access, and what actions it's allowed to perform. This is important for security and compliance, ensuring that agents operate within defined boundaries. The declarative nature of AGENTS.md makes it easy to review and audit agent policies. Interoperability is a key benefit of these standards. Agents built on MCP can communicate with any tool that implements the protocol, regardless of who built it. Agents built with Goose can be deployed in any environment that supports the framework. Agents documented with AGENTS.md can be understood and integrated by any developer familiar with the specification. This interoperability prevents vendor lock-in and enables a diverse ecosystem. The layered architecture is intentional. MCP handles communication, Goose handles orchestration, and AGENTS.md handles policy. This separation of concerns allows each layer to evolve independently while maintaining compatibility. Developers can mix and match components, using MCP with a different framework or AGENTS.md with a different protocol, as long as they maintain compatibility at the interfaces. Adoption challenges exist. For these standards to be effective, they need widespread adoption across the industry. This requires buy-in from major AI companies, which may have competing interests. However, the Linux Foundation's neutral position and the open-source nature of the contributions help address these concerns. The participation of major companies like Google, AWS, and Cloudflare suggests strong industry support. Looking forward, these standards could become as fundamental to AI agents as HTTP and REST are to web services. They provide the foundation for an interoperable agent ecosystem where different agents can work together, tools can be shared across platforms, and policies can be enforced consistently. The success of these standards will depend on community adoption, tooling maturity, and demonstrable benefits over proprietary solutions.